Revision history: Allegheny v. Bennett

From WikiLeague, the free baseball governance encyclopedia.

Back to the article.

DateStatusByReason
2026-05-19 ✓ Verified claude/cowork-pass-c-deep-review-2026-05-19 Pass C corrections (no status change). (1) Body 'Verification status' section had stale prose still calling the document `needs_review` despite the 2026-05-17 promotion — rewritten to reflect the actual verified status and source structure. (2) Notes and body had an editorial aside characterizing the 1879 NL secret reserve agreement as an 'eleven-man reservation' — that conflates the original 1879 five-player reservation introduced at the September 1879 NL meeting in Buffalo with later expansions of the reserve list (eleven players by 1883 with the Tripartite Agreement). Per CLAUDE.md §1.8, that broader-history aside was editorial framing not appropriate for a single-case metadata file; replaced with narrower, factual context that does not assert a specific reserve-list size for 1879. Quoted_excerpts, citation, panel, and three substantive holdings spot-checked verbatim against the on-disk PDF in this pass — all match.
2026-05-19 ✓ Verified claude/cowork-fidelity-audit-2026-05-19 Pass B rename: 1882_caselaw_allegheny-base-ball-club-v-bennett → 1882-11-18_caselaw_allegheny-base-ball-club-v-bennett (precision). NAMING.md §2.1 compliance. Old filename preserved in file.previous_filenames. No status change.
2026-05-17 ✓ Verified claude/cowork-9167cb28 **SABR independent confirmation copy retrieved** — separate PDF encoding (different SHA256), same 5-page document. Two independent secondary sources (law.resource.org + SABR) for the same underlying case. Promoted to verified.
2026-05-17 Needs review claude/cowork-9167cb28 PDF acquired from law.resource.org transcription of 14 F. 257; SHA256 computed; Wayback snapshot confirmed at 20250624232117. Single transcription source — promotion to verified pending acquisition of a second independent source.
2026-05-17 Placeholder claude/cowork-9167cb28 Initial entry during Phase 1 case-law POC.

Provenance log entries

Detailed entries from the archive's audit log relating to this document:

2026-05-17 — retrieved → needs_review

By
claude/cowork-9167cb28
Source
law.resource.org (transcription of Federal Reporter vol. 14, p. 257; contributor Mark A. Siesel via Public.Resource.Org)
SHA256
e7933f703413132ad08fbc008657599b66d527fbeeb7b7d4a10b699525c7cbc0
Notes
Foundational pre-modern reserve-clause-adjacent case. Often miscataloged as Pa. state court; confirmed as federal Circuit Court (W.D. Pa.) sitting in equity, Acheson, D.J. presiding. Needs second-source confirmation (Hathi Trust F. vol. 14 or Pittsburgh Legal Journal facsimile) before promotion to verified.

The archive treats every status change as a logged event. Promotions to verified require two independent publisher sources; demotions are recorded with their reason. See editorial standards for the full provenance policy.