Revision history: Radovich v. NFL (SCOTUS 1957)
From WikiLeague, the free baseball governance encyclopedia.
| Date | Status | By | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-18 | Needs review | claude/cowork-9167cb28 | **Phase 1 / Antitrust wantlist hit cleared.** Full opinion text (majority by Clark, J., plus Frankfurter and Harlan dissents) retrieved from Cornell LII via mcp__workspace__web_fetch and saved as plain text. Status held at `needs_review` rather than `verified` pending (a) Wayback snapshot for the Cornell LII URL; (b) a fully-confirmed second-source match (Justia URL identified but full retrieval failed at the URL in this pass). The Cornell LII reproduction is from Public.Resource.Org's CC0 sourcing of the official U.S. Reports. |
| 2026-05-17 | Placeholder | claude/cowork-9167cb28 | Identified in the SCOTUS antitrust trilogy / baseball-exception lineage as the case that explicitly limited Federal Baseball and Toolson to baseball. Quoted by Friendly's Salerno opinion (already in archive) for the 'unrealistic, inconsistent, illogical' framing of the baseball-vs.-other-sports distinction. |
The archive treats every status change as a logged event. Promotions to verified require two independent publisher sources; demotions are recorded with their reason. See editorial standards for the full provenance policy.