Revision history: CBC v. MLBAM (8th Cir. 2007)
From WikiLeague, the free baseball governance encyclopedia.
| Date | Status | By | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-19 | Needs review | claude/cowork-pass-c-deep-review-2026-05-19 | **Demotion.** Pass C deep textual review against the underlying PDF identified a substantive omission: the opinion is 13 pages, not 8, and the missing 5 pages are a Colloton, J., dissent in part. Prior metadata characterized the panel as a unanimous Arnold-authored affirmance ('Loken, C.J., Arnold and Colloton, Circuit Judges (Arnold, C.J., writing for the panel)') and made no mention of the dissent in parties, abstract, key_provisions, or notes. The ruling is in fact 2–1: Arnold (joined by Loken) for the majority; Colloton dissenting on the breach-of-contract claim while agreeing with the First Amendment / right-of-publicity analysis. file.pages, processing_notes, parties, citation.court, citation.other, abstract, and key_provisions have all been updated in this pass to reflect the actual divided panel. Re-promotion requires a fresh content-verification pass that explicitly addresses the dissent. See research-logs/discrepancies/2026-05-19_pass-c-deep-metadata-review.md §B.2 and §C.4. |
| 2026-05-19 | ✓ Verified | claude/cowork-fidelity-audit-2026-05-19 | Pass A truth-up: added archive_url. The court ECF primary_url has no Wayback snapshot (federal court ECF systems routinely block Wayback). Per STANDARDS.md §2.5, archive_url is set to the Wayback snapshot (20230323023733) of the bit-identical Justia mirror (confirmation_sources[1], same SHA256). snapshot_notes added explaining the federal-court-ECF-blocking situation. Note: the original 2026-05-18 promotion reason claimed 'Wayback snapshots exist for both URLs' — that is in fact only true for the Justia mirror, not the court ECF. Promotion to `verified` still stands because the bit-identical Justia mirror IS preserved and the file content is recoverable from the snapshot. No status change. |
| 2026-05-18 | ✓ Verified | claude/cowork-9167cb28 | Court's ECF file IS a primary-publisher source (the originating court itself published it). The Justia mirror is bit-identical to the same file, and Wayback snapshots exist for both URLs. The court's published opinion text is treated as authoritative on its own terms. Promotion to `verified` reflects the court-system primary-publisher status plus the identical Justia mirror confirmation. |
| 2026-05-18 | Needs review | claude/cowork-9167cb28 | **Phase 2 wantlist hit cleared.** Court's ECF PDF acquired via user upload. Justia mirror confirmed bit-identical. |
| 2026-05-17 | Placeholder | claude/cowork-9167cb28 | Listed in the wantlist as the appellate ruling affirming the 2005-2006 district court fantasy-stats ruling already in archive. |
The archive treats every status change as a logged event. Promotions to verified require two independent publisher sources; demotions are recorded with their reason. See editorial standards for the full provenance policy.